Israel 2.0 – Chapter 5

Posted on by

More on the greatest ally of the USA

  • For more videos about the topic , search for “Israel” in the Search Window and verify everything said in these videos on your own.
  • The first post seems to be taken from my mind. ~ JCG

My Honest Answers to Your Israel Questions

EHUD BARAK: “NETANYAHU HAS COMPLETELY GONE OFF THE RAILS” — w/ Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski – 08/20/2026

 

 

Note by Grok

Yes, the post is substantially accurate about the core ruling.

In State of New South Wales v Farhat [2026] NSWSC 985 (decision dated 17 August 2026), NSW Supreme Court Justice Desmond Fagan ruled that the slogan “Fuk Israel” (spray-painted during a 2024 vandalism/arson incident) is not antisemitic. He described it as a crude political expression of contempt directed at a foreign state, not as hatred or prejudice against Jewish people as such.

Key points from the judgment that align with the post:

  • Israel (the country/state) is not equivalent to the Jewish people. Hostility toward Israel cannot automatically be equated with hostility toward Jews.
  • Many Jewish people, including in Australia, criticize Israel’s policies (especially regarding Palestinians).
  • Zionism, as a political ideology of Jewish nationalism, is open to discussion and criticism.
  • The judge rejected attempts to treat anti-Israel or anti-Zionist statements as inherently antisemitic and criticized the IHRA working definition of antisemitism as verbose, imprecise, and “detached from the reality of the common usage and understanding of antisemitism in this country.”

Minor caveats

  • It is the Supreme Court of New South Wales (the highest court in that Australian state), not the High Court of Australia (the national apex court). Referring to it as the “Australian Supreme Court (NSW)” is a common shorthand but slightly imprecise.
  • The case arose in the specific context of an application for an extended supervision order under terrorism legislation against a man who had been paid to commit the graffiti/arson. The judge found he was essentially a “vandal for hire” rather than ideologically driven, and that the anti-Israel slogans did not make the offending antisemitic or indicative of a terrorism risk.
  • The ruling is recent (reasons published mid-to-late August 2026) and has been described as controversial; the NSW government has indicated it is seeking advice on a possible appeal.

The post’s framing comes from an explicitly anti-Zionist account (“Jews United Against Zionism”), so it presents the decision in a way that supports that perspective. However, the central claim—that the NSW Supreme Court held anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel are not antisemitic, and that Israel is a country distinct from the Jewish people—is consistent with what Justice Fagan wrote.

IDF Begins Marking Palestinians With Numbers – Aug 21, 2026

BREAKING: NETANYAHU TO ESCALATE IN GAZA AFTER CHILDRENS’ KITES LANDED IN ISRAEL – 08/23/2026

 

NBC News Crew BEATEN LIVE By Israeli Settlers – Aug 31, 2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“NETANYAHU RATTLED?” Venice-Winning “NAZA” Documentary Sparks Fury Over Gaza Civilian Death Claims – Sep 15, 2026

Israeli Government SCRAMBLES As IDF Whistleblowers Speak Out – Sep 16, 2026

  • Sorry for mixing posts about “Jewish” and Israel. Thigs that IMHO are very different. ~ JCG

Why Is Israel Spreading Antisemitism On Purpose? – 09/25/2026

Why is Israel so afraid of the film NAZA? We spoke to its directors – Sep 29, 2026

Israel Hit With A MASSIVE Thailand Problem – And It’s Getting Worse! – 09/29/2026

  • Planetary Invaders. ~ JCG

CNN Just Accidentally EXPOSED Israel!! – 10/02/02/26

Israelis: What language did your grandparents speak? – 10/02/2026

Must Watch: DNA Panic Hits Jewish Americans… The Israel Myth Just Collapsed – Sep 30, 2026

Continue to Chapter 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Views: 0

Related Posts:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *