Israel 2.0 – Chapter 7

Israel 2026

Watch Chapter 6 and Previous

Israel Is A Child Sacrifice Cult? With Jess Elofson – Oct 2, 2026

The Israeli settlers behind West Bank conflict with Palestinians | 60 Minutes – Oct 12, 2026

  • By “60 Minutes? Amazing. ~ JCG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corruption and Political Crimes – Part 3

A post with a thousand stories of corruption

Watch Part 1

Dan Bongino Just Did IT AGAIN… – 10/02/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Candace GOING MAX into Charlie’s assassination – Part 3

Is Charlie’s Assassination Saga ever going to end?

EXCLUSIVE: Never Before Seen Rooftop Footage. Plus, The Rookie Cop Who Found the Gun. | Ep 367 – Jul 28, 2026

EXCLUSIVE: Never Before Seen Photos Of “Tyler Robinson” On Campus. More On George Zinn… | Ep 374 – Aug 10, 2026

Huh? Erika Kirk Sits Down With A Trans-Loving Reporter. We Reveal The Moderator For Friday’s Debate. – 08/11/2026

Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson: The Great Debate. – 08/14/2026

Candace Owens EMBARRASSES Andrew Wilson on Charlie Kirk Facts – 08/14/2026

  • Where did Andrew get $300 K to pay for this interview? ~ JCG

CHARLIE is ALIVE! Collab w/ DDGotaPodcast! – 08/19/2026

  • I didn’t wat this whole video. ~ JCG

NEW EVIDENCE: Charlie Kirk Was Killed By A Military Drone! w/ John Cullen – 08/20/2026

Who Fell Out Of Charlie’s SUV? TPUSA Makes A HUGE Mistake Releasing Alleged Text from Charlie. – Sep 3, 2026

More Exclusive Footage! For Whatever It’s Farnsworth… | Ep 386 – 09/14/2026

BIG NEWS! Erika To File A Wrongful Death Lawsuit. For Charlie Or For PR? | Ep 388 – 09/16/2026

WE WERE RIGHT! UVU Releases Their Independent Review. | Ep 394 – 09/25/2026

  • Please, do your own research. ~ JCG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Epstein Files – Starting DEC – 2025

Watch also

Introduction by Comet AI on 12/23/25

US authorities have just released another large batch of “Epstein files,” adding detail on how investigators built the case against Jeffrey Epstein and renewing scrutiny of several high‑profile associates, including Donald Trump and Britain’s former Prince Andrew. The documents are being posted in stages under a new US law requiring broad public disclosure of federal files related to Epstein, but many materials remain heavily redacted to protect victims.bbc+4​

What was just released

  • The US Department of Justice has posted more than 10,000 additional files, totaling over 10 gigabytes, including internal emails, investigative reports, search-planning documents, and photos.abcnews.go​

  • These releases are happening under the “Epstein Files Transparency” law passed by Congress, which ordered DOJ to disclose its Epstein-related records by a set deadline, though DOJ says it cannot fully meet that timeline because of redaction work.bbc+3​

New details on the investigation

  • Newly released materials describe operational planning around Epstein’s 2019 arrest, internal reactions inside the government after his jailhouse death, and items such as his fake Austrian passport under an alias.abcnews.go​

  • Emails also reference efforts to track and subpoena additional people in Epstein’s network, including “a wealthy business man in Ohio,” showing investigators were actively pursuing other potential targets.abcnews.go​

Mentions of Donald Trump

  • Several documents and internal emails state that Donald Trump traveled on Epstein’s private jet more times in the 1990s than was publicly known, with some trips including Ghislaine Maxwell.aljazeera+2​

  • The files so far do not themselves allege that Trump committed crimes with Epstein, but they deepen the record of their past social and travel links and have led to renewed political criticism and scrutiny.pbs+3​

References to Prince Andrew

  • A set of old emails from 2001–2002, tied to the new release, appear to involve Britain’s former Prince Andrew using a pseudonymous account called “The Invisible Man” and signing messages as “A.”france24+1​

  • In one email sent from “Balmoral,” Andrew supposedly asks Maxwell whether she has found him “some new inappropriate friends,” language that has intensified public and media attention on his historic ties to Epstein and Maxwell, though the emails by themselves do not constitute criminal charges.bbc+1​

Limits and what is still unknown

  • DOJ and the FBI have previously said there is no formal “client list” in the government’s Epstein files, even though many public discussions use that phrase; conspiracy theories about such a list continue online.bbc​

  • Victims and some lawmakers argue the releases are over-redacted and slow, while DOJ maintains that redactions are necessary to shield survivors’ identities and ongoing investigative methods, so many names, leads, and possible targets remain unclear for now.nytimes+4​

  1. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c3e0y1vqj09t
  2. https://abcnews.go.com/US/justice-department-releases-additional-documents-epstein-files/story?id=128622392
  3. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20251223-latest-epstein-files-renew-scrutiny-of-britain-s-ex-prince-andrew
  4. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20r07dg6kro
  5. https://www.npr.org/2025/12/23/nx-s1-5653302/more-epstein-files-released-trump-mentioned
  6. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/23/newly-released-epstein-files-spotlight-trumps-past-jet-trips-with-maxwell
  7. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/latest-epstein-document-release-includes-multiple-trump-mentions
  8. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12/23/us/epstein-files-trump
  9. https://www.perplexity.ai/search/which-is-the-normal-blood-pres-dATbhXC2SPOfP8WkpQ9Crg
  10. https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-epstein-files-12-23-25
  11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdPv6eUDoo0

  • Behind the laughter, comedians often reveal profound truths. ~ JCG

  • Nice conversation… ~ JCG

  • Fantastic Video! ~ JCG

  • Not sure why but I don’t longer trust these beauties, (male & female). ~ JCG

  • Who owns her? She is under Trump. Why the files are not transparent? ~ JCG

“Caught Red Handed!” Trump’s DOJ Protecting Pedophiles, Epstein Cover-Up Just Got Worse | Redacted – 02/12/2026

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charlie Kirk Assasination – September 10 – 2025 – For The Records

Introduction

~ by Grok 4 – Expert Mode on 9/10/25 @ 5:38 PM PST

Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot on September 10, 2025, during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. Reports indicate a person of interest was initially taken into custody in connection with the shooting, as stated by Utah Governor Spencer Cox and FBI Director Kash Patel. However, the FBI later clarified that this individual was questioned and released, as they were determined not to be the shooter. As of the latest updates, the actual suspected shooter remains at large, with conflicting statements from officials contributing to ongoing confusion. No official identification of the shooter has been released, and claims circulating on social media (such as allegations of a 17-year-old transgender individual named Omar) appear unsubstantiated or speculative.

  • Query: “Please respond with the truth. Did Charlie Kirk criticized Israel lately?”

Charlie Kirk has expressed some criticisms of aspects related to Israel in recent months, particularly regarding U.S. foreign policy priorities and unconditional support for the country, while still affirming his overall pro-Israel stance and emphasizing an “America First” approach to avoid new wars or deeper U.S. entanglement. For instance:

– He has voiced frustration with Jewish leaders and pro-Israel advocates who have turned against him for platforming critics like Dave Smith, despite his long history of supporting Israel, stating he feels “deflated” as a “warrior for Israel.”
– Kirk has criticized Congress for putting Israel’s interests ahead of America’s, opposed expanding anti-BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) legislation, and highlighted skepticism among young conservatives about the U.S.-Israel relationship, including concerns over U.S. leaders not prioritizing America.
– During the 2025 Israel-Iran conflict, he praised Israel’s military actions but warned against U.S. regime-change efforts in Iran, called for quick peace to prevent escalation, and noted President Trump’s firmness with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over ceasefire violations.

That said, Kirk has not fully withdrawn his support for Israel—he has repeatedly defended the country against accusations (e.g., denying claims of starving Gazans), shared positive personal stories about Israel, and celebrated ceasefires or peace deals involving it. His criticisms appear focused on U.S. policy and perceived ingratitude from some pro-Israel figures rather than outright opposition to Israel itself.

  • I didn’t get a good vibe from this video but I think that we should allow all opinions to be listened and besides that, there are several interesting points to be discussed like “October 7 and 9/11.”
  • I did stop listening to Charlie when I found out that he was Pro Israel, meaning Pro Zionism and is connected to my question to Grok. ~ JCG

  • MK Ultra?
  • Is he the real shooter? – I don’t know why but I don’t buy it. Check out the video after the next one to see what I’m saying.
  • What happened with Trump’s shooter in Butler? ~ JCG

  • Fishy

~ by Tucker

  • I don’t believe in the FBI Narrative. Sorry. ~ JCG

Please take a look at “Bill Ackman – For The Records“

  • Looks to me that there are a lot of distractions to expose who really killed Charlie.

  • Conspiracy theory or reality?
  • It keeps smelling fish. ~ JCG

  • Not long ago I wrote a comment stating that “PBD” has been bought by Israel. ~ JCG

Please, watch “The Charlie Kirk Assassination and Erika Kirk’s Response – Continuation – Prompt 09252025.” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

News worth saving – September – 2025

More exciting or more depressing news?

Read more about Charlie Kirk’s Assasination

Charlie Kirk Minions DOX Workers, 680k DEAD In Gaza & How Zionists CREATED Middle East w/ Sabby Sabs – 9/15/25

  • Just a theatre? ~ JCG

Republicans IN PANIC: Massie Forces Imminent Epstein Files Release – What are they hiding? – 9/25/25

Netanyahu’s speech is an affront to the international conscience: Analysis – 9/26/25

🚨WATCH James Comey Gets Arrested LIVE After INDICTMENT | FBI Confirms 300 Agents at January 6th!? – 9/26/25

US Senate News LIVE: Kash Patel Finally Exposed Big Names | Charlie Kirk | Donald Trump | Kash Patel – 9/26/25

  • This is a long video but here is a summary.

🎥 Video Summary by Copilot Smart MoDe, (GPT-5) on 9/27/25

Title: US Senate News LIVE: Kash Patel Finally Exposed Big Names | Charlie Kirk | Donald Trump | Kash Patel

  • The video covers a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing where Kash Patel, serving as FBI Director in this context, clashed with Sen. Cory Booker.
  • Booker’s Criticism: He accused Patel of causing “generational destruction” of the FBI and predicted Patel wouldn’t last long in his role.
  • Patel’s Response: He fired back, calling Booker an “embarrassment” and rejected claims that he politicized the FBI.
  • Key Issues Raised:
    • Allegations of politicization of the FBI.
    • Controversy around the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation.
    • Firings of senior FBI officials on September 16, 2025.
  • The video frames this as a chaotic and heated exchange, highlighting partisan divides and Patel’s combative defense of his leadership.

✅ Takeaway

The hearing became a flashpoint for debates over the FBI’s independence, with Patel aggressively defending himself against Democratic criticism, while critics argued his leadership has undermined the Bureau’s credibility.

Yes, Juan — I dug into the coverage of that Senate hearing and the video you shared. The “big names” referenced in the title are tied to two controversies Kash Patel was grilled on: the Jeffrey Epstein files and the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. Here’s a breakdown of the names that came up and why:


🧾 Names Exposed / Mentioned in the Hearing & Video

1. Donald Trump

  • Why Mentioned: Lawmakers pressed Patel on whether Trump’s name appears in the Epstein files.
  • Context: A letter allegedly written by Trump to Epstein for his 50th birthday surfaced, sparking questions. Trump denied writing it and even sued media outlets that reported on it.
  • Patel’s Position: He refused to confirm or deny if Trump’s name appears in the files, saying only that the FBI would release what it was “legally permitted” to.

2. Jeffrey Epstein

  • Why Mentioned: Central figure in the hearings. Patel was questioned about the FBI’s handling of Epstein’s files and whether there was a “client list.”
  • Patel’s Position: Claimed there was “no credible information” that Epstein trafficked victims to anyone besides himself — a statement that contradicted survivor testimony and prior court documents.

3. Prince Andrew (Duke of York)

  • Why Mentioned: Survivors like Virginia Giuffre had previously alleged Epstein trafficked her to Prince Andrew and other powerful men.
  • Context: Though not directly accused in Patel’s testimony, his denial of a “client list” implicitly dismissed these long-standing allegations.

4. Cory Booker (Senator, D–NJ)

  • Why Mentioned: Had a heated exchange with Patel, accusing him of “generational destruction” of the FBI and predicting he wouldn’t last long as director.
  • Patel’s Response: Called Booker an “embarrassment.”

5. Adam Schiff (Senator, D–CA)

  • Why Mentioned: Patel lashed out at Schiff, calling him “the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate” during questioning.

6. Charlie Kirk

  • Why Mentioned: Conservative activist whose assassination in Utah triggered scrutiny of Patel’s leadership.
  • Context: Patel was criticized for prematurely announcing the suspect was in custody, causing confusion.

7. Other Figures (Indirect Mentions)

  • Brian Driscoll: Former senior FBI official who alleged he was fired under Trump’s influence.
  • Survivors of Epstein’s abuse: Their testimony (naming businessmen, politicians, and royalty) was contrasted with Patel’s claim that Epstein had “no clients.”

✅ Bottom Line

The “big names” exposed in the hearing/video were:

  • Donald Trump (Epstein files controversy)
  • Jeffrey Epstein (central to the files)
  • Prince Andrew (linked via survivor testimony)
  • Cory Booker & Adam Schiff (clashed with Patel in the hearing)
  • Charlie Kirk (assassination case mishandled by Patel)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Epstein 3 – For The Records

The biggining of the End?

Please watch Epstein 1 and Epstein 2.

  • Not sure what to think about this…….

Republicans IN PANIC: Massie Forces Imminent Epstein Files Release – What are they hiding? – 9/25/25

Trump Orders Beheading Of Mystery Epstein DC Statue As DOJ Investigator Says CIA, Israel Ran Epstein – 9/25/25

  • Who is telling the Truth?

  • Another point of view.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Who killed Mike? – Promt – 08242025

 

The Real Story?

Questions to different AI Platforms

Query date: 8/24/2025

“In the song “They Don’t care about Us.” Is there a line in the original version that says “Don’t Jew me”?

~ by Grok 4 Expert mode

Yes, the original version of Michael Jackson’s “They Don’t Care About Us” (from the 1995 album *HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I*) includes controversial lyrics in the second verse, but there is no line that says “Don’t Jew me.” The actual wording is “Jew me, sue me, everybody do me / Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me.” These lines sparked significant backlash for being perceived as antisemitic, leading Jackson to issue apologies and alter the lyrics in later pressings and remixes by replacing “Jew me” with “do me” (or censoring it with sounds) and “kike me” with “strike me.”

by Copilot Deep Research mode:

Introduction

Michael Jackson’s 1995 protest song “They Don’t Care About Us,” the fourth single from his album HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I, stands as one of the most politically charged and controversial works in his discography. Central to this controversy are the lyrics in its original release, which many accused of containing anti-Semitic language—most notably, the lines “Jew me, sue me, everybody do me / Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me.” The ensuing uproar led to public outcry from major Jewish organizations, global media coverage, and ultimately, significant revisions to subsequent versions of the track. This report delves deeply into the evidence surrounding the song’s original lyrics, the context and public response, edits and re-releases, and the legacy of the controversy as documented by official sources, mainstream music publications, and academic analyses.


Original Official Lyrics of “They Don’t Care About Us”

HIStory Album Booklet and Pressings

Upon its release on June 16, 1995, HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I, distributed by Epic Records/Sony, included a lyric booklet for the album’s second disc featuring original compositions such as “They Don’t Care About Us.” The earliest booklets and pressings of the album contained the full, uncensored lyrics in question:

Beat me, hate me, you can never break me
Will me, thrill me, you can never kill me
Jew me, sue me, everybody do me
Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me

(Verse 2, original 1995 lyrics)

Multiple reliable web archives, official lyric sites, and music encyclopedias confirm the presence of these lyrics in the first printings of the album around the world, including in the US and Europe. No reputable source has ever documented the alternate lyric “Don’t Jew me”; rather, the phrase as officially released was “Jew me, sue me, everybody do me”.

Confirmation in Music Databases and Label Communications

The original text is preserved in various lyric repositories and remains cited in academic studies and press reporting as:

Jew me, sue me, everybody do me
Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me.

The Michael Jackson estate’s official site, as well as databases like Discogs and Genius, reference these lyrics in discussions of the song’s unedited version.


HIStory Album Liner Notes and Booklet Evidence

The HIStory album’s liner notes and booklet for its earliest pressings included full lyrics and credits, without any censorship or notes regarding controversy. Academic and fan-based transcriptions from this era—as well as scans of physical booklets viewed on fan and collector sites—confirm the presence of these lines.

Notably, the Michael Jackson Wiki provides a structured reproduction of the lyrics as found in these original materials:

Jew me, sue me, everybody do me
Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me.

No official version of the liner notes or booklet from the initial run has been documented to have censored or omitted these lines prior to the public controversy.


Epic Records Press Releases and Song Launch

When HIStory and “They Don’t Care About Us” were first released, neither Epic Records nor Michael Jackson publicly anticipated the lyrics would generate controversy. The label and Jackson’s team initially described the album as a statement against prejudice and injustice, aligning with the song’s intended theme of opposition to racism and discrimination.

Official marketing and press events at the time celebrated the album as a bold, autobiographical statement by Jackson, with “They Don’t Care About Us” envisioned as a protest anthem. Only after the media highlighted the lyrics did the label respond with explanations, public relations campaigns, and, eventually, direct apologies and edits.


The Spark: Simon Wiesenthal Center Protest, 1995

Within days of the album’s release, Jewish organizations such as the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) expressed serious concern over the use of the phrases “Jew me” and “kike me”. The Simon Wiesenthal Center, alarmed at these “obviously anti-Semitic stereotypes,” sent direct protests to both Michael Jackson and Sony Records:

“The Center immediately protested these obviously antisemitic stereotypes that millions of people would be exposed to, directly to Michael Jackson and demanded that he and Sony Records remove the offensive lyrics from the album.”

This protest had a profound and immediate impact, triggering worldwide media scrutiny, and leading to condemnations from prominent members of the Jewish community, including Steven Spielberg and numerous editorial boards.


Public Reaction and 1995–1996 Media Response

Major News Outlets Reporting

Mainstream media—including The New York Times, The Seattle Times, Los Angeles Times, Rolling Stone, and Billboard—reported not only the controversy but published the lyrics verbatim.

The New York Times Coverage

A June 15, 1995 article in The New York Times was the first major publication to highlight the potentially anti-Semitic content, directly citing the lines:

“Jew me, sue me, everybody do me / Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me”.

The Times opined that Jackson’s attempt to deliver an anti-racism message backfired, with Jon Pareles writing:

“In … ‘They Don’t Care About Us’, he gives the lie to his entire catalogue of brotherhood anthems with a burst of anti-Semitism.”

The Seattle Times and Other Editorials

Patrick Macdonald of The Seattle Times echoed this sentiment:

“There really is no excuse for using terms like ‘Jew me’ and ‘kike’ in a pop song, unless you make it clear you are denouncing such terms, and do so in an artful way.”

These and similar articles triggered widespread debate in the public sphere and within the recording industry.


Billboard, Rolling Stone, and Music Industry Commentary

Larry Flick of Billboard noted that:

“…the song’s much-documented offending words were obscured by sound effects” (in later pressings). He added that, “…with or without those words, this song comes across as less an intended indictment of the world’s oppressive forces and more as lightly shrouded ramblings of personal paranoia.”

Rolling Stone’s James Hunter observed that Jackson was no longer hiding his embattled persona, and that the song’s rawness departed from earlier messages of unity:

“[Jackson] sounded more embattled than ever.”


Jewish Community Responses

Key voices in the Jewish community, including the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the ADL, were deeply troubled. Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean of the Wiesenthal Center, commented:

“I don’t think that Jackson used the anti-Semitic slurs intentionally, but rather that the superstar did not understand the implications of his words.”

The incident even prompted Sony executives, such as Michael Schulhof, to become involved in damage control and messaging about corporate responsibility.


Michael Jackson’s Apology and Public Statements

Initially, Michael Jackson defended the contentious lyrics both through his representatives and in direct statements to the press:

“The idea that these lyrics could be deemed objectionable is extremely hurtful to me, and misleading. The song in fact is about the pain of prejudice and hate and is a way to draw attention to social and political problems. I am the voice of the accused and the attacked. I am the voice of everyone. I am the skinhead, I am the Jew, I am the black man, I am the white man. I am not the one who was attacking. It is about the injustices to young people and how the system can wrongfully accuse them. I am angry and outraged that I could be so misinterpreted.”

Later, in interviews such as ABC News’ Prime Time Live (with then-wife Lisa Marie Presley), Jackson stated:

“It’s not anti-Semitic because I’m not a racist person … I could never be a racist. I love all races.”

Despite these explanations, the public and industry pressure mounted. Within days, Jackson issued a formal apology:

“I just want you all to know how strongly I am committed to tolerance, peace and love, and I apologize to anyone who might have been hurt.”

In subsequent press materials and in a letter to Jewish leaders, Jackson emphasized that his intention was to denounce all forms of hate, stating that he would add an explanatory note to future shipments of the album and would re-record the offending lines.


Lyric Alterations and Censorship in Reissues

Announcement and Implementation of Edits

On June 23, 1995, Michael Jackson and Epic Records announced that they would edit the lyrics for all future released copies of HIStory. Jackson promised to substitute the words “Jew me” and “kike me” with “do me” and “strike me.” However, in practice, most reissues did not contain cleanly re-recorded vocals; instead, sound effects—distorted synthesizer or percussive noises—masked the original words, making them indistinct on the audio track.

Later, remixed versions and radio edits went further, entirely excluding the problematic terms or replacing the sequence with repeated or alternative lines, such as “sue me, sue me” in some mixes.

Official Table: Original vs. Edited Lyrics

Lyric VersionLine 1Line 2
Original (1995)Jew me, sue me, everybody do meKick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me
Censored (1995/6 reissues)*** me, sue me, everybody do meKick me, **** me, don’t you black or white me
Revised/remixSue me, sue me, everybody do meKick me, kick me, don’t you black or white me
Officially intended (per statements)Do me, sue me, everybody do meKick me, strike me, don’t you black or white me

In summary, the original phrase “Jew me” was indeed present in the first pressings and official releases of the song; it was not present as “Don’t Jew me,” but as part of the sequence “Jew me, sue me, everybody do me.” Subsequent versions censored or replaced the line.

Evidence from Physical Releases and Digital Platforms

Collectors and fans, as well as scans of product booklets on collector sites and album liner note archives, confirm the presence of the unedited lines in early pressings. Reports in specialist media and fan communities note that reissued CDs, cassettes, and vinyl pressings from late 1995 onward featured the edited, censored, or sound-effect-masked lyrics, consistent with Jackson and Epic’s public statements.

All subsequent official releases of the track, including streaming services and greatest hits collections, use only the censored or edited versions, no longer publishing the original slurs in their print or digital lyrics.


Music Videos and Spike Lee’s Role

In conjunction with the song’s release, two official music videos for “They Don’t Care About Us” were directed by Spike Lee: one shot in the favelas of Brazil and the other set in a prison, interspersed with footage illustrating human rights abuses. These videos played a significant role in framing the song as a protest anthem and, after the controversy, helped to redirect the public narrative away from the lyric scandal toward broader discussions of social justice.

Later releases of the music video, as well as the “Director’s Cut” released during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, did not use the original uncensored lyrics, and instead incorporated the edited or masked versions.


Academic and Cultural Research and Censorship Studies

Academic work on Jackson’s career and the history of censorship in popular music recognizes the controversy as a landmark case regarding the boundaries of artistic expression, intent versus impact, and public accountability in popular culture.

Scholarly articles and books—such as Man in the Music by Joseph Vogel and research published in Popular Music Studies—have positioned “They Don’t Care About Us” as a protest song and have noted that the use of the slurs was intended, by Jackson’s own account, to expose bigotry, not propagate it. Nevertheless, these works generally agree that the impact of the language, regardless of intent, justifiably prompted calls for its censorship and re-recording.


Wikipedia Article and Edit History

Wikipedia and other crowd-sourced music encyclopedias have preserved a clear, sourced record of the evolution of the song’s lyrics, the controversy, and the timeline of public and official interventions based on mainstream media sources and historical documents.


Direct Quotes from Official Sources and Music Publications

To ensure clarity on the song’s history and Jackson’s response, here are representative quotes from official and reputable sources:

  • HIStory Album Liner Notes (earliest pressings):

    “Jew me, sue me, everybody do me / Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me”.

  • Michael Jackson’s Official Statement:

    “I am angry and outraged that I could be so misinterpreted.”

  • Simon Wiesenthal Center News Release:

    “Original Michael Jackson Song Lyrics Changed Following SWC 1995 Protest: Apology letter on view at SWC Headquarters”.

  • The New York Times:

    “There really is no excuse for using terms like ‘Jew me’ and ‘kike’ in a pop song…”.

  • Jackson’s Apology, reissue back insert:

    “My intention was for this song to say ‘No’ to racism, anti-Semitism and stereotyping. Unfortunately, my choice of words may have unintentionally hurt the very people I wanted to stand in solidarity with.”.


Legacy, Subsequent Editions, and Reception

The controversy and Jackson’s subsequent apology marked a defining episode in the history of music censorship. It is one of the most widely cited examples in discussions of mainstream artists facing public backlash for language seen as perpetuating racial or ethnic stereotypes, regardless of intent.

After the edits were implemented, the censored versions were used in all official outlets: radio, video, streaming, and future print editions. The original uncensored version became a collector’s curiosity, referenced in critical and academic discussions but not in mainstream circulation.

Furthermore, the importance of the controversy persisted in debates about artistic freedom and responsibility, cited in studies of music and social activism, and referenced in public discussions during subsequent resurgences of the song in protest movements (notably after the death of George Floyd in 2020).


Conclusion

Direct Answer to the Research Question:
The original version of Michael Jackson’s “They Don’t Care About Us,” as initially released in June 1995 on HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I, contained the lyrics “Jew me, sue me, everybody do me / Kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me.”
The phrase “Don’t Jew me” did not appear in any official or unofficial transcript, lyric sheet, or album track, nor is it found in any translation or credible reference. The controversy centered on the use of “Jew me” (as a verb), a phrase that is recognized as a slur in English.

Widespread backlash from Jewish organizations and the general media led to Michael Jackson issuing multiple public apologies, adding written statements to subsequent album shipments, and (after June 23, 1995) altering the lyrics for all future releases of the song. These edits were implemented via either sound-effect censorship in the audio or by substituting alternative lyrics (“do me” and “strike me”), while some remixes used repeated harmless lines. The uncensored lyrics remain present only in the earliest CD/cassette/vinyl pressings of the original album, and all official digital and later physical versions use the edited form.

The original controversy, Jackson’s response, and the evolving edits are thoroughly documented in liner notes, liner inserts, news articles, academic research, and crowd-sourced music encyclopedias.


Analytical Summary Table: Timeline of Lyric Versions & Key Events

DateEventLyric Version (Key Line)Source Type
June 16, 1995HIStory released; first shipments with uncensored lyrics“Jew me, sue me… Kick me, kike me…”Liner/booklet, music sites, news
June 15–17, 1995NYT and other major press report controversy; ADL, SWC protestUneditedNews, official statements
June 17, 1995Jackson issues public apology, promises notes in album bookletUneditedOfficial statements, news
June 23, 1995Jackson and Epic announce re-recorded/edited future lyrics“Do me, sue me… Kick me, strike me…” (intended)News, label statements
Summer 1995 onwardReissued versions: sound effects mask slurs, some radio edits use repeated phrases“*** me, sue me… Kick me, **** me…”Reissues, discographies
1996–presentMusic videos, remixes, all future compilations and digital platforms feature only edited versionsCensored/editedOfficial sites, reissue booklets

Final Notes

No official version has ever used the lyric “Don’t Jew me.”
The controversy, documentary record, and the responses from Jackson, record label, Jewish organizations, and music journalists all center on the phrase “Jew me,” its interpretations, and the changes made in response. The evidence across primary sources, news archives, official statements, liner notes, academic research, and digital platforms is consistent and robust in this regard.


In conclusion: The phrase “Jew me” (as part of “Jew me, sue me…”) did appear in the original official lyrics of Michael Jackson’s “They Don’t Care About Us” as released on HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I in June 1995. After intense controversy and public protest from Jewish advocacy groups and media, the lyric was removed or masked in all subsequent official releases. No version, official or otherwise, contains or contained the phrase “Don’t Jew me”; this is not historically attested in any official material. The controversy remains a milestone case in the modern history of music censorship and discussions of social responsibility in popular culture.

 

 

 

 

 

Bad actors to be treated the right way – With Justice?

“We’ve been waiting for accountability”

Please read “George Soros – For The Records.”

Comey Releases Statement in Shocking Video – 9/26/25

Matt Gaetz Reacts to James Comey Indictment | ‘A Higher Loyalty’ Backfires – 9/28/25

  • Heaven’s Justice? :)

Douglas Murray on Fox: “Israel Is Winning, But The West Is Losing” — My Response – 10/7/2025

 

  • Happy to see the deep level of corruption exposed. ~ JCG

How are you trading Nancy? :)

Well Well Well, John Bolton INDICTED For What He Accused Trump Of…10/16/25

  • Very difficult to listen to this liar. For money? For a belief? For Power? “The Chosen ONES”?

Pam Bondi Calls For ARREST of Nancy Pelosi!!! – 10/24/25

  • Nothing so far?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

News worth saving – August – 2025

Things are getting interesting as we follow the Epstein saga and the Russian collusion story

  • Election integrity. 

Watch Sylvester Stallone DESTROY Woke Hollywood As Trump HONORS HIM at Kennedy Center! – 8/13/25

  • New Old news.

  • Ghislaine Maxwell’s DOJ interview transcripts
  • California Governor Gavin Newsom is emerging as a formidable Democratic contender for 2028

  • I don’t think that this video has the right title but it has good infomation.