Traveling in Iran in the midst of war – Starting March 2026

by Propaganda & Co.

Introduction by Copilot Smart on March 24/2026

The profile “Propaganda & Co” (@propandco on X/Twitter) is a politically charged account that focuses on exposing and critiquing propaganda, often through video content and long-form threads. It positions itself as a media watchdog, highlighting coordinated disinformation campaigns and controversial figures.

The @propandco account is not a personal profile but part of a broader media project called Propaganda & Co, which operates across multiple platforms (X/Twitter, YouTube, Telegram, and its own website). It produces politically charged videos and commentary, mainly focused on propaganda analysis, Middle East conflicts, and U.S. politics. The identity of the individual(s) behind it is not publicly disclosed.


🔎 Key Details About @propandco

  • Handle: @propandco
  • Tagline: “Everything is propaganda. We make videos.”
  • Content Style: Primarily threads and videos analyzing political narratives, media manipulation, and alleged disinformation campaigns.
  • Platform Presence: Active on X (Twitter) and also shares content via Thread Reader App.

📌 Themes & Focus

  • Propaganda Analysis: The account frequently claims that certain political or media events are not “organic” but rather coordinated psyops.
  • Middle East Politics: Posts include strong criticism of Israel, often framing actions as propaganda or distraction tactics.
  • U.S. Political Commentary: Mentions figures like Elon Musk, Nick Shirley, Jake Lang, and Laura Loomer, often in the context of alleged disinformation or manipulation.
  • Tone: Highly opinionated, confrontational, and activist-oriented.

🧩 Example Content

  • On Israel: Suggests that Israel uses propaganda agents to distract from accusations of genocide.
  • On U.S. Figures: Claims Elon Musk boosts certain accounts for political reasons.
  • On Laura Loomer: Accuses her of using influence to rescind visas for children from Gaza.

⚠️ Risks & Considerations

  • Bias: The account is openly partisan and presents strong ideological positions.
  • Controversial Claims: Many posts involve accusations of manipulation, fraud, or conspiracy, which may not be independently verified.
  • Audience: Likely appeals to users skeptical of mainstream narratives and interested in alternative or activist perspectives.

📊 Quick Profile Snapshot

AttributeDetails
Username@propandco
Motto“Everything is propaganda. We make videos.”
Content TypeThreads, videos, political commentary
Focus AreasPropaganda, Israel-Palestine conflict, U.S. politics, media narratives
ToneCritical, activist, conspiratorial
PlatformsX (Twitter), Thread Reader App

 

 

Iran At War Episode 1

The War in Iran – Tehran | Episode 2 – 04/08/2026

The War in Iran- Isfahan | Episode 3 – 04/11/2026

Bandar Abbas & the Strait of Hormuz – The War in Iran | Episode 6 – 04/21/2026

I Faced Real Danger While In Iran – Apr 26, 2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Censure, Censorship and Propaganda

 

Censorship – 审查 – सेंसरशिप – Censura

What is Censorship?

~ by Chat GPT 5

Censorship in present times refers to the deliberate suppression, restriction, or regulation of information, speech, images, or ideas by governments, corporations, or other powerful actors—often justified on grounds such as public safety, national security, misinformation control, or community standards. In the modern political and social media environment, censorship has become more complex, decentralized, and technologically mediated than in previous eras.

At its core, censorship involves controlling what can be seen, said, or shared. Historically, this meant state bans on books, newspapers, or broadcasts. Today, the landscape is shaped heavily by digital platforms such as Meta Platforms (owner of Facebook and Instagram), X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and TikTok, which act as powerful gatekeepers of online discourse.


The Modern Dimensions of Censorship

1. Government Censorship

In many countries, governments directly restrict online speech through laws, filtering systems, or pressure on platforms. This can include:

  • Blocking websites or apps

  • Criminalizing certain political speech

  • Requiring platforms to remove content

  • Internet shutdowns during unrest

A prominent example is the Great Firewall operated by the government of China, which tightly controls foreign websites and politically sensitive content. More democratic nations also engage in content regulation, though typically framed around combating extremism, hate speech, or foreign interference.

Key tension: national security and public order vs. freedom of expression.


2. Platform (Corporate) Moderation

Unlike traditional state censorship, much of today’s content control is carried out by private technology companies enforcing their terms of service.

Platforms routinely:

  • Remove posts deemed misinformation

  • Label disputed political claims

  • Demote content algorithmically (“shadow banning”)

  • Suspend or permanently ban accounts

High-profile moderation actions—such as the suspension of Donald Trump from major platforms after the events of January 6, 2021—sparked global debate about whether corporate moderation constitutes necessary governance or excessive censorship.

Key tension: platform safety and advertiser concerns vs. open digital public square.


3. Algorithmic and Invisible Censorship

Modern censorship is often subtle rather than overt. Instead of outright bans, platforms may:

  • Reduce content visibility

  • Downrank controversial topics

  • Personalize feeds in ways that limit exposure

Because these mechanisms are opaque, critics argue they create soft censorship that is difficult to detect or challenge. This is sometimes called:

  • algorithmic suppression

  • de-amplification

  • shadow banning (controversial and often disputed)

Key issue: lack of transparency and accountability.


4. Political Polarization and Narrative Control

In the current political climate, accusations of censorship frequently come from multiple sides of the ideological spectrum.

Common claims include:

  • Governments censor dissenting political views

  • Platforms disproportionately moderate certain ideologies

  • Foreign states conduct information suppression or manipulation

  • Fact-checking is used as political gatekeeping

Because social media functions as a primary news source for millions, control over online speech is now directly tied to electoral politics, public opinion, and democratic legitimacy.


5. Misinformation, Disinformation, and the Justification Debate

One of the defining features of present-day censorship debates is the rise of large-scale misinformation and disinformation campaigns.

Platforms and governments argue that moderation is necessary to limit:

  • election interference

  • public health misinformation

  • extremist recruitment

  • coordinated influence operations

Critics counter that:

  • definitions of “misinformation” can be politicized

  • emergency measures often expand over time

  • over-moderation chills legitimate debate

This creates a persistent policy dilemma: how to limit demonstrably harmful falsehoods without suppressing legitimate dissent or minority viewpoints.


Emerging Trends (2020s and beyond)

1. Regulatory expansion
Governments worldwide are passing laws requiring faster content removal and greater platform accountability.

2. Decentralized platforms
New networks aim to reduce centralized control, though they face moderation and safety challenges of their own.

3. AI-driven moderation
Automated systems increasingly detect and remove content at scale, raising concerns about errors, bias, and due process.

4. Geopolitical fragmentation
The internet is gradually splintering into regionally governed ecosystems with different speech norms and legal regimes.


Bottom Line

In present times, censorship is no longer just about governments banning speech. It is a multi-layered system of control involving states, technology companies, algorithms, and social pressures. The central political question is no longer whether content is moderated—it inevitably is—but who decides the boundaries of acceptable speech, under what rules, and with what transparency and accountability.


What’s the difference between Censure and Censorship?

Censure and censorship sound similar but mean very different things. The simplest way to think about it:

  • Censure = formal criticism or condemnation

  • Censorship = suppression or control of information

Here’s the deeper breakdown.


Censure

Definition:
Censure is the act of officially expressing strong disapproval of someone’s actions, usually through a formal vote or public statement.

Key characteristics:

  • It is symbolic or disciplinary, not suppressive

  • It does not remove speech or content

  • It often comes from legislative or governing bodies

  • It publicly condemns behavior

Political example:
The United States Senate can formally censure a senator for misconduct. The person keeps their position but is officially reprimanded.

Everyday example:
A company publicly reprimands an employee for violating policy.

👉 Think of censure as “calling someone out officially.”


Censorship

Definition:
Censorship is the suppression, restriction, or control of speech, information, or content deemed objectionable, harmful, or sensitive.

Key characteristics:

  • It prevents or limits expression

  • It can be done by governments, platforms, or institutions

  • It often removes, blocks, or hides content

  • It directly affects what people can see or say

Modern example:
A social media platform removes posts it classifies as misinformation.

👉 Think of censorship as “stopping the message from spreading.”


Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureCensureCensorship
Core meaningFormal disapprovalSuppression of content
Effect on speechDoes not remove speechLimits or removes speech
Typical contextLegislative discipline, official reprimandsMedia, internet, government controls
NatureSymbolic/punitiveRestrictive/control-based
ExampleSenate reprimands a memberPlatform deletes a post

Quick Memory Trick

  • Censure = criticize

  • Censorship = control speech


If you’d like, I can also explain how the two sometimes get confused in modern political debates.

Candace & Tyler Oliveira Just BROKE What’s Really HAPPENING..

The Truth! Israel is being BLACKED OUT! – 03/07/2026

  • No Press inside Gaza, No Press telling what is happening in Israel after the Iran bombing . What is that called?

Propaganda

CAUGHT: The “Traitors” Pushing the Iran Drone Pysop!! – 03/12/2026

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson Might be Arrested! Find Out Why! – 03/15/2026

The Secret Liberal Network Controlling Speech – 03/22/2026

Zionism: “A Maker Of MONSTERS” | Dr Ghada Karmi & Matt Kennard – 04/15/2026

  • A PROPAGANDA MACHINE. ~ JCG

BBC Propagandist HUMILIATED By Pro-Iran Lego Movie Creator! – 04/17/2026

The Most Important Tucker Carlson Video You Will Watch – Apr 30, 2026

Tucker and Megyn Kelly React to Candace Being Called Anti-Semitic – 05/12/2026

THIS IS F***ING TERRIFYING – 06/17/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

BETAR? What is it? – Prompt 11012025

BETAR and the Israeli Progaganda

by GROK 4 – Deep Research Mode

 Key Points
– Overview: Betar is a right-wing Zionist youth movement founded in 1923, emphasizing Jewish nationalism, self-defense, and the establishment of a Jewish state. It is associated with Revisionist Zionism and has been influential in Zionist history, though its militant approach has sparked debate.
– Ideology: Research suggests Betar promotes principles like national pride, military preparedness, and Zionist monism (prioritizing Zionism above other ideologies), but critics often highlight its paramilitary style and links to far-right elements.
– Historical Role: It played a part in Jewish self-defense during the pre-state era and the Holocaust, contributing to Israel’s founding, yet evidence leans toward involvement in controversial paramilitary actions.
– Current Status: Active globally with chapters in multiple countries, Betar focuses on anti-antisemitism activism; however, recent activities, especially by Betar US, have drawn accusations of extremism.
– Controversies: While supporters view it as a defender of Jewish rights, opponents argue it fosters Islamophobia and harassment, with some sources labeling it a hate group—highlighting ongoing divisions within Zionist communities.

Founding and Structure
Betar, short for Brit Yosef Trumpeldor, was established in Riga, Latvia, in 1923 by Ze’ev Jabotinsky as a youth wing of the Revisionist Zionist movement. Named after Joseph Trumpeldor, a Jewish hero known for his defense of Tel Hai, it aimed to cultivate a “new Jew”—proud, disciplined, and capable of self-defense. The movement grew rapidly in the 1930s, reaching up to 90,000 members, primarily in Eastern Europe, and organized into a hierarchical structure with Jabotinsky as its leader (rosh Betar) from 1931. Today, it operates as a global network with chapters in the US, Europe, Australia, and elsewhere, focusing on Zionist education and activism.

Core Ideology
Betar’s ideology centers on Revisionist Zionism, advocating for Jewish sovereignty over historic Palestine (including both sides of the Jordan River) through strength and nationalism. Key concepts include “Hadar” (dignity and respect) and “Magen” (protection via military readiness), with an emphasis on Hebrew language, discipline, and rejecting socialist influences in Zionism. It promotes self-determination and resilience, but this has been critiqued for its aggressive stance against perceived threats.

Historical Significance
From the 1920s to 1940s, Betar emphasized education in Hebrew, self-defense training, and illegal immigration (Aliyah Bet) to Palestine, smuggling thousands amid British restrictions. It aligned with the Irgun paramilitary group, participating in revolts against the British Mandate and conflicts during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. During the Holocaust, members joined ghetto uprisings in Warsaw and elsewhere. Post-1948, it contributed to Israeli settlements and institutions, with alumni like former Prime Ministers Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir.

 Modern Activities and Branches
In recent decades, Betar has focused on combating antisemitism and promoting Zionist values through protests, education, and community events. Betar US, revived in 2023, has been active in countering pro-Palestinian protests during the Gaza conflict, including doxxing campaigns. Global membership is around 21,000, with activities varying by region, such as anti-BDS demonstrations in the UK and seminars in South America.

Controversies
Betar has faced criticism for its militant roots, including accusations of fascist influences (e.g., brown uniforms adopted before Nazism’s rise) and ties to Kahanism, which advocates religious segregation. Recent actions by Betar US, such as threats in the “Pager Campaign” and calls for deportations, have led to labels of extremism from groups like the ADL. Supporters argue these are defensive measures, but critics highlight potential harassment and free speech suppression.Betar, formally known as the Betar Movement or Brit Yosef Trumpeldor, represents a significant chapter in the history of Zionism, particularly its right-wing Revisionist branch. Founded amid rising antisemitism and nationalist fervor in early 20th-century Europe, it sought to redefine Jewish identity through strength, discipline, and activism. While it has been praised for its contributions to Jewish self-defense and Israel’s establishment, it has also been embroiled in debates over its paramilitary style, ideological extremism, and contemporary actions. This overview draws from historical accounts, official sources, and critical perspectives to provide a balanced examination.

 Origins and Early Development
The movement’s inception traces back to 1923 in Riga, Latvia, where Ze’ev Jabotinsky, a prominent Zionist leader, addressed a group of Jewish youth organized by Aharon Propes. Jabotinsky, inspired by events like the Arab attacks on Tel Hai in 1920, called for a militant response to threats against Jewish communities. He envisioned Betar as a vehicle to create a “new type of Jew”—one free from diaspora vulnerabilities, embodying pride, courage, and readiness for defense. The name “Betar” evokes the ancient fortress that was the last holdout in the Bar Kokhba revolt against Rome in 135 CE, symbolizing resilience. It also stands as an acronym for Brit Yosef Trumpeldor, honoring Trumpeldor, who died defending Tel Hai and whose last words—”It is good to die for our country”—became a rallying cry.

By the 1930s, Betar had ballooned into one of the largest Jewish youth organizations, with nearly 90,000 members, concentrated in Poland (around 40,000) and extending to Palestine, Lithuania, Austria, and beyond. In Poland, it received government support for military training, positioning itself against local antisemitic groups like the National Radical Camp (ONR). Activities included Hebrew education, cultural programs, and paramilitary drills, fostering a sense of national unity amid economic hardship and persecution. This era also saw physical clashes with socialist Zionist groups, underscoring ideological rifts within the broader Zionist movement.

 Ideological Foundations
At its core, Betar adheres to Revisionist Zionism, which diverged from mainstream Labor Zionism by rejecting gradualism and socialism in favor of immediate statehood through force if necessary. Jabotinsky’s “Iron Wall” doctrine—advocating unyielding strength against Arab opposition—influenced Betar’s emphasis on military preparedness. The movement’s oath, proposed in 1935, pledged devotion to a Jewish state with a majority on both sides of the Jordan River.

Key principles, outlined in Jabotinsky’s Seven Principles of the Oath, include:

| Principle | Description |
|———–|————-|
| Zion | Eretz Israel as the sole solution to Jewish suffering in the diaspora. |
| Had-Ness (Monism) | Zionism as the supreme, singular ideal, rejecting fusion with other creeds like socialism. |
| Hadar | Encompassing beauty, respect, self-esteem, politeness, and faithfulness; a code of conduct for members. |
| Magen (Protection) | Mandatory military seminars and weapon training for defense readiness. |
| Hebrew Language | Hebrew as the eternal national language; essential for Jewish completeness. |
| Giyus (Mobilization) | Readiness for any service to the Jewish people, inspired by Trumpeldor. |
| Tziyut (Obedience) | Voluntary discipline to maintain unity and strength. |

These ideals promoted a nationalist, disciplined ethos, but critics have pointed to fascist parallels, such as the adoption of brown uniforms (chosen for symbolizing the earth of Eretz Israel) and salutes, which predated but echoed European fascist movements. Jabotinsky himself rejected fascism, but the movement’s authoritarian structure and anti-leftist stance fueled such associations.

 Role in Pre-State and Wartime Efforts
Betar’s activism intensified in the late 1930s with “illegal” Aliyah Bet operations, smuggling an estimated 40,000 Jews to Palestine amid Nazi advances and British immigration quotas. In Palestine, members formed work brigades and settlements, engaging in clandestine defense within the Irgun framework. The movement’s naval and aviation units laid groundwork for Israel’s future military, with graduates contributing to the navy and air force.

During World War II, Betar branches in Europe were decimated by the Holocaust, but survivors participated in resistance, including the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising via the Jewish Military Union. In Palestine, alliances with Irgun led to guerrilla actions against British and Arab forces, including bombings and sabotage—actions that supporters frame as necessary defense but critics label as terrorism. Post-1945, under leaders like Menachem Begin (former Betar Poland head), it supported the revolt against the British Mandate, aiding Israel’s independence in 1948.

Post-Independence Evolution
After Israel’s founding, Betar shifted toward education, settlement building (e.g., border villages like Mevo Betar), and sports, affiliating with Israeli federations. Membership declined in the 1970s amid Israel’s political shifts, but it remained tied to Herut (later Likud), producing figures like Benjamin Netanyahu’s father, Benzion, who served as Jabotinsky’s aide. Globally, it organized protests against Soviet antisemitism in the 1970s and anti-Semitic incidents in Europe in the 2010s.

In the 21st century, Betar maintains around 21,000 members, with regional variations:

| Region | Key Activities and Status |
|——–|—————————|
| Africa (e.g., South Africa) | Summer camps, Israel programs; membership has dwindled due to emigration. |
| Australia | Protests against neo-Nazis and anti-Israel figures; sends members to hasbarah (advocacy) programs. |
| Europe (e.g., UK, France) | Counter-BDS demonstrations, self-defense training; lost UK charity status in 2004 for political activities. |
| North America (US, Canada) | Campus activism against “Israeli apartheid” narratives; Betar US revived in 2023, focusing on tours including West Bank visits. |
| South America (e.g., Brazil, Uruguay) | Weekly meetings, camps; revived in 2010s with growing youth involvement. |
| Israel | Political advocacy; criticized for prioritizing politics over ideology amid right-wing fragmentation. |

Contemporary Controversies and Criticisms
Betar’s legacy includes accusations of fostering extremism. Historical ties to Irgun bombings and figures like Meir Kahane (linked to Kahanism, which calls for segregating non-Jews) have led to labels of “Jewish fascism.” In modern times, Betar US has drawn sharp criticism for actions during the 2023–present Gaza war, including doxxing pro-Palestinian students via “Operation Wrath of Zion” and submitting deportation lists to U.S. authorities. The 2025 “Pager Campaign”—threatening to distribute pagers (echoing Israel’s Lebanon attacks) to critics like UN officials and Jewish anti-Zionists—has been called a death threat by targets such as Peter Beinart.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has blacklisted Betar US as a hate group for Islamophobia and harassment, while civil rights advocates argue it stifles free speech by conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism. Supporters, including Betar spokespeople, counter that such actions defend Jewish communities against rising threats, dismissing critics like the ADL as “left-wing.” Recent X posts from Betar accounts highlight internal Zionist debates, such as opposition to boycotts of far-right Israeli parties like Otzma Yehudit at the World Zionist Congress.

Notable figures like former Israeli politicians Ehud Olmert and Danny Danon emerged from Betar, illustrating its enduring influence in right-wing politics. However, its secrecy—limited public details on leaders—and aggressive tactics continue to fuel controversy, with some sources portraying it as a fringe element within Zionism. Overall, Betar embodies the tensions between defensive nationalism and perceived radicalism, reflecting broader debates in Jewish and Zionist discourse.

 Key Historical Milestones
| Year | Event | Significance |
|——|——–|————–|
| 1923 | Founding in Riga by Jabotinsky | Established as a militant Zionist youth group amid rising antisemitism. |
| 1931 | Jabotinsky elected rosh Betar | Formalized global structure and principles at first world conference. |
| 1935 | Adoption of Ha-Neder oath | Emphasized commitment to a Jewish state on both sides of the Jordan. |
| 1937–1944 | Aliyah Bet operations | Smuggled 40,000 Jews to Palestine, defying British quotas. |
| 1943 | Warsaw Ghetto Uprising participation | Betar fighters resisted Nazis, symbolizing Jewish defiance. |
| 1944–1948 | Irgun alliance and anti-British revolt | Contributed to Israel’s independence through paramilitary actions. |
| 1948–1960s | Settlement and institution building | Established 12 settlements; influenced Israeli navy and air force. |
| 1970s–1980s | Protests against Soviet antisemitism | Global activism for Jewish emigration rights. |
| 2014 | Marches in France against antisemitism | Responded to rising European threats with public demonstrations. |
| 2023 | Betar US revival | Intensified activism amid Gaza conflict, including counter-protests. |
| 2025 | Pager Campaign launch | Controversial threats against anti-Israel figures, escalating criticisms. |

In summary, Betar’s trajectory from a pre-state defense network to a modern activist group underscores its role in shaping right-wing Zionism, while its methods invite ongoing scrutiny from both within and outside Jewish communities.

Key Citations
– [Home – Betar US: Zionist Movement of Ze’ev Jabotinsky](https://betarus.org/)
– [Our History – Betar US: Zionist Movement of Ze’ev Jabotinsky](https://betarus.org/about/history/)
– [Betar – Jewish Virtual Library](https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/betar)
– [What is Betar US, the group pushing to deport pro-Palestinian …](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/3/25/what-is-betar-us-the-group-pushing-to-deport-pro-palestinian-students)
– [Betar China: The Impact of a Remote Jewish Youth Movement, 1929 …](https://jcpa.org/article/betar-china-the-impact-of-a-remote-jewish-youth-movement-1929-1949/)
– [Ideology – Betar](https://betar.org.au/ideology/)
– [מכון ז’בוטינסקי | Betar and Hadar – Jabotinsky Institute](https://en.jabotinsky.org/zeev-jabotinsky/life-story/betar-and-hadar/)
– [[PDF] POLISH JEWS AND THE BETAR YOUTH MOVEMENT … – Stacks](https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/bd752jg9919/DANIEL%2520K.%2520HELLER%2520FINAL%2520DRAFT%2520OF%2520DISSERTATION%2520AUGUST%25202012-augmented.pdf)
– [Betar – Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betar)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trump – For the Records – 2

Important Updates of the USA after January 20-2025

Note: Even though I am a Trump supporter, not all the videos in this blog post support Trump.

  • BOOM! :)

Dems Resistance to the law!

  • The other side of the coin?

  • This one made me laugh! Valentine’s day gift! :) :)

  • Great summary to date.

Important one!

  • IMHO a shame for the so-called Democrats.

>

  • Free speech is under attack under the guise of combating antisemitism.

  • I did enjoy this video and at the same time I wonder if there is something hidden connected to it. ~ JCG

  • Not very happy about the war against Thomas Massie.

Continue Here >>>>